{"id":68991,"date":"2015-09-09T20:48:15","date_gmt":"2015-09-09T23:48:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/?p=68991"},"modified":"2015-09-09T20:48:15","modified_gmt":"2015-09-09T23:48:15","slug":"standard-and-poors-tira-grau-de-investimento-do-brasil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/2015\/09\/09\/standard-and-poors-tira-grau-de-investimento-do-brasil\/","title":{"rendered":"Standard and Poor&#8217;s tira grau de investimento do Brasil"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>G1<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>O Brasil perdeu o grau de investimento na classifica\u00e7\u00e3o de cr\u00e9dito da Standard and Poor&#8217;s (S&amp;P), informou a ag\u00eancia de classifica\u00e7\u00e3o de risco nesta quarta-feira (09). A nota do pa\u00eds foi rebaixada de &#8220;BBB-&#8221; para &#8220;BB+&#8221;, com perspectiva negativa. O rebaixamento do rating do Brasil para a categoria &#8220;especulativa&#8221; acontece <a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/economia\/noticia\/2015\/07\/standard-poors-muda-perspectiva-de-nota-do-brasil-para-negativa.html\">menos de 50 dias ap\u00f3s a ag\u00eancia ter mudado a perspectiva para negativa<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div id=\"entenda_o_caso_362\" class=\"entenda-o-caso componente_materia\">\u00a0<a class=\"box-entenda-o-caso\" href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/economia\/noticia\/2015\/09\/standard-and-poors-tira-grau-de-investimento-do-brasil.html\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"foto-caso\" src=\"http:\/\/s2.glbimg.com\/575mSB-c4xC1ro4cp9dCixINo2Q=\/0x54:620x333\/300x135\/s.glbimg.com\/jo\/g1\/f\/original\/2015\/08\/31\/2015-08-12t002837z_1006880001_lynxnpeb7b00i_rtroptp_3_negocios-dolar-fecha-final.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"135\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"conteudo\">\n<div class=\"titulo\">S&amp;P REBAIXA BRASIL<\/div>\n<div class=\"sub-titulo\">Pa\u00eds perde grau de investimento<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<ul class=\"lista-de-links\">\n<li class=\"link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/economia\/noticia\/2015\/09\/standard-and-poors-tira-grau-de-investimento-do-brasil.html\">not\u00edcia do rebaixamento<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/economia\/noticia\/2015\/09\/leia-integra-da-decisao-da-sp-que-tirou-o-grau-de-investimento-do-brasil.html\">\u00edntegra do an\u00fancio da s&amp;p<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/economia\/noticia\/2015\/09\/o-que-significa-para-o-brasil-perda-do-grau-de-investimento-entenda.html\">o que \u00e9 grau de investimento<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/politica\/noticia\/2015\/09\/parlamentares-reagem-negativamente-perda-do-grau-de-investimento.html\">repercuss\u00e3o pol\u00edtica<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/economia\/blog\/thais-heredia\/post\/chegou-o-momento-de-vender-brasil.html\">an\u00e1lise de tha\u00eds her\u00e9dia<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/economia\/noticia\/2015\/09\/recursos-nao-saem-automaticamente-do-pais-apos-corte-da-sp-diz-analista.html\">an\u00e1lise da austin rating<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p>Em seu comunicado, a ag\u00eancia chama a aten\u00e7\u00e3o para a deteriora\u00e7\u00e3o fiscal e a falta de coes\u00e3o da equipe ministerial, como causas da decis\u00e3o de rebaixar a nota.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Os desafios pol\u00edticos que o Brasil enfrenta continuam a pesar na capacidade do governo e vontade de submeter ao Or\u00e7amento de 2016 ao Congresso consistente com a pol\u00edtica de ajuste fiscal assinalada durante o segundo mandato da presidente Dilma Rousseff\u201d, destaca a S&amp;P.<em>Veja a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalcreditportal.com\/ratingsdirect\/renderArticle.do?articleId=1448685&amp;SctArtId=339649&amp;from=CM&amp;nsl_code=LIME&amp;sourceObjectId=9329662&amp;sourceRevId=1&amp;fee_ind=N&amp;exp_date=20250909-04:05:17&amp;sp_mid=58283&amp;sp_rid=1830987\" target=\"_blank\">\u00edntegra do comunicado<\/a> (em ingl\u00eas) mais abaixo<\/em><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Segundo a ag\u00eancia, a <a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/politica\/noticia\/2015\/08\/ministro-entrega-projeto-do-orcamento-de-2016-ao-congresso.html\">proposta do Or\u00e7amento do governo para 2016 com um d\u00e9ficit R$ 30,5 bilh\u00f5es<\/a>, ou o equivalente a 0,3% do PIB em vez dos 0,7% previstos em julho, &#8220;reflete um desacordo com a composi\u00e7\u00e3o e magnifude das medidas necess\u00e1rias para reequilibrar as contas p\u00fablicas&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Acreditamos que a situa\u00e7ao de cr\u00e9dito do Brasil enfraqueceu desde 28 de julho, quando a perspectiva do Brasil foi revisada para &#8220;negativa&#8221;. No momento, conclu\u00edmos que houve um aumento elevado do risco para a pol\u00edtica de corre\u00e7\u00e3o fiscal em andamento, principalmente decorrendo da din\u00e2mica flu\u00edda no Congresso, associada aos efeitos das investiga\u00e7\u00f5es de corrup\u00e7\u00e3o da estatal Petrobras. N\u00f3s temos agora menos convic\u00e7\u00e3o na pol\u00edtica fiscal&#8221;, destaca a SP&amp;P.<\/p>\n<p>No mercado financeiro, a nota de um pa\u00eds funciona como um &#8220;certificado de seguran\u00e7a&#8221; que as ag\u00eancias de classifica\u00e7\u00e3o d\u00e3o a pa\u00edses que elas consideram com baixo risco de calotes a investidores.<\/p>\n<div class=\"saibamais componente_materia\"><strong>saiba mais<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/economia\/noticia\/2015\/09\/o-que-significa-para-o-brasil-perda-do-grau-de-investimento-entenda.html\">Entenda o que \u00e9 grau de investimento<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/economia\/noticia\/2015\/08\/moodys-rebaixa-nota-do-brasil-e-muda-perspectiva-para-estavel.html\">Moody&#8217;s rebaixa nota do Brasil e muda perspectiva para est\u00e1vel<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/economia\/noticia\/2015\/04\/fitch-muda-perspectiva-brasileira-para-negativa.html\">Fitch muda perspectiva de nota de cr\u00e9dito brasileira para negativa<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/g1.globo.com\/economia\/noticia\/2015\/07\/brasil-perde-grau-de-investimento-em-classificacao-de-agencia-de-risco-local.html\">Brasil perde grau de investimento em classifica\u00e7\u00e3o de ag\u00eancia de risco local<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>Justificativas<\/strong><br \/>\nEm resumo, a ag\u00eancia justificou o rebaixamento com base em 3 pontos:<br \/>\n&#8211; Os desafios pol\u00edticos que o Brasil enfrenta continuam a pesar na capacidade do governo de submeter or\u00e7amento ao Congresso que seja consistente com a pol\u00edtica de corre\u00e7\u00e3o prometida no in\u00edcio do segundo mandato da presidente Dilma Rousseff.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; A proposta do Or\u00e7amento 2016 mostra \u201cmais um desafio para a meta fiscal&#8221; menos de seis semanas ap\u00f3s a \u00faltima revis\u00e3o da nota brasileira. Para a S&amp;P, esse desafio \u201cpoderia significar 3 anos seguidos de d\u00e9ficit prim\u00e1rio e aumento cont\u00ednuo da d\u00edvida se os rendimentos subsequentes ou medidas de cortes de gastos n\u00e3o forem tomadas\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; A perspectiva negativa, de acordo com a ag\u00eancia, reflete uma probabilidade de &#8220;um em tr\u00eas\u201d de um novo rebaixamento devido \u00e0 deteriora\u00e7\u00e3o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o fiscal do pa\u00eds, e uma mudan\u00e7a potencial da din\u00e2mica pol\u00edtica, incluindo uma falta de coes\u00e3o dentro do gabinete presidencial, ou devido a uma turbul\u00eancia econ\u00f4mica.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nota em escala nacional<\/strong><br \/>\nA ag\u00eancia tamb\u00e9m rebaixou o rating soberano de longo prazo em moeda local (escala nacional) para &#8216;BBB-&#8216; de &#8216;BBB+&#8217;, com perspectiva negativa.<\/p>\n<div class=\"foto componente_materia midia-largura-620\">\n<ul>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"classifica\u00e7\u00e3o de risco notas brasil ag\u00eancias (Foto: Editoria de Arte\/G1)\" src=\"http:\/\/s2.glbimg.com\/rSFTKQhO1hD1qH8v3QlEeEeGIT0=\/s.glbimg.com\/jo\/g1\/f\/original\/2015\/09\/09\/classificacao-das-agencias-de-risco-grau-de-investimento_1.jpg\" alt=\"classifica\u00e7\u00e3o de risco notas brasil ag\u00eancias (Foto: Editoria de Arte\/G1)\" width=\"620\" height=\"747\" \/><\/div>\n<p><strong>Brasil conquistou grau de investimento em 2008<\/strong><br \/>\nA S&amp;P \u00e9 a primeira ag\u00eancia entre as maiores a tirar o grau de investimento do Brasil. Na Moody\u00b4s, o pa\u00eds est\u00e1 no \u00faltimo degrau, antes do grau especulativo. Na Fitch, o Brasil segue dois degraus acima.<\/p>\n<p>O Brasil conquistou o grau de investimento pelas ag\u00eancias internacionais Fitch Ratings e Standard &amp; Poor\u2019s em 2008. Em 2009, conquistou a classifica\u00e7\u00e3o pela Moody\u2019s.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Selo de bom pagador<\/strong><br \/>\nO grau de investimento \u00e9 um selo de qualidade que assegura aos investidores um menor risco de calotes. A partir da nota de risco que determinado pa\u00eds recebeu, os investidores podem avaliar se a possibilidade de ganhos (por exemplo, com juros maiores) compensa o risco de perder o capital investido com a instabilidade econ\u00f4mica local.<\/p>\n<p>Alguns fundos de pens\u00e3o internacionais, de pa\u00edses da Europa ou os Estados Unidos, por exemplo, seguem a regra de que s\u00f3 se pode investir em t\u00edtulos de pa\u00edses que est\u00e3o classificados com grau de investimento por ag\u00eancias internacionais. Por isso, essa &#8220;nota&#8221; permite que o pa\u00eds receba recursos de investidores interessados em aplicar seu dinheiro naquele local.<\/p>\n<p>A perda do grau de investimento na S&amp;P significa tamb\u00e9m um rev\u00e9s para a equipe econ\u00f4mica liderada pelo ministro da Fazenda, Joaquim Levy, que vem trabalhando para tentar melhorar o perfil das contas p\u00fablicas visando n\u00e3o s\u00f3 o equil\u00edbrio fiscal como tamb\u00e9m o risco de perda do chamado &#8220;grau de investimento&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00cdntegra do comunicado da S&amp;P, em ingl\u00eas<\/strong><br \/>\nBrazil Foreign Currency Ratings Lowered To &#8216;BB+\/B&#8217;; Outlook Is Negative<\/p>\n<p>Overview<\/p>\n<p>The political challenges Brazil faces have continued to mount, weighing<br \/>\non the government&#8217;s ability and willingness to submit a 2016 budget to<br \/>\nCongress consistent with the significant policy correction signaled<br \/>\nduring the first part of President Dilma Rousseff&#8217;s second term.<br \/>\nThe government&#8217;s 2016 budget proposal envisions yet another change to the<br \/>\nprimary fiscal target less than six weeks after the previous downward<br \/>\nrevision, which would mean three consecutive years of a primary deficit<br \/>\nand net general debt continuing to rise if subsequent revenue or<br \/>\nexpenditure measures are not taken.<br \/>\nWe are lowering the long-term foreign and local currency sovereign<br \/>\nratings on Brazil to &#8216;BB+&#8217; and &#8216;BBB-&#8216;, respectively.<br \/>\nThe negative outlook reflects what we believe is a greater than<br \/>\none\u2013in\u2013three likelihood of a further downgrade due to a further<br \/>\ndeterioration of Brazil&#8217;s fiscal position, potential key policy reversals<br \/>\ngiven the fluid political dynamics, including a further lack of cohesion<br \/>\nwithin the president&#8217;s cabinet, or due to greater economic turmoil than<br \/>\nwe currently expect.<\/p>\n<p>Rating Action<br \/>\nOn Sept. 9, 2015, Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s Ratings Services lowered its long-term<br \/>\nforeign currency sovereign credit rating on the Federative Republic of Brazil<br \/>\nto &#8216;BB+&#8217; from &#8216;BBB-&#8216;, and the long-term local currency sovereign credit rating<br \/>\nto &#8216;BBB-&#8216; from &#8216;BBB+&#8217;. The outlook is negative. We also lowered the short-term<br \/>\nforeign currency rating to &#8216;B&#8217; from &#8216;A-3&#8217; and the short-term local currency<br \/>\nrating to &#8216;A-3&#8217; from &#8216;A-2&#8217;. We also lowered the transfer and convertibility<br \/>\nassessment to &#8216;BBB&#8217; from &#8216;BBB+&#8217;. We affirmed the &#8216;brAAA&#8217; national-scale rating<br \/>\nand revised the outlook on this rating to negative.<br \/>\nRationale<\/p>\n<p>We believe Brazil&#8217;s credit profile has weakened further since July 28, when we<br \/>\nrevised the outlook on Brazil to negative. At that time, we signaled increased<br \/>\nexecution risks to the corrective policy changes already underway, mainly<br \/>\nstemming from fluid political dynamics in Congress associated with spillover<br \/>\neffects from investigations of corruption at state-owned energy company<br \/>\nPetrobras. We now perceive less conviction within the president&#8217;s cabinet on<br \/>\nfiscal policy.<\/p>\n<p>Brazil&#8217;s 2016 budget proposal tabled on Aug. 31 incorporated yet another<br \/>\nrevision to the government&#8217;s fiscal targets in a short period of time. The<br \/>\nproposed budget is based on a primary deficit of 0.3% of GDP, rather than the<br \/>\npreviously revised 0.7% of GDP surplus target that was announced in July. This<br \/>\nchange reflects internal disagreement about the composition and magnitude of<br \/>\nmeasures needed to redress the slippage in public finances.<\/p>\n<p>Without an unexpected overperformance, the proposed fiscal target in the<br \/>\nbudget would yield three consecutive years of primary (non-interest) fiscal<br \/>\ndeficits and a continual rise of net general government debt. While the<br \/>\nMinistry of Finance is working on putting forward various measures to regain<br \/>\nthe 0.7% of GDP initial surplus target, they will need to be negotiated<br \/>\npiecemeal with Congress. More importantly, the series of events leading to the<br \/>\nbudget proposal suggests to us diminished cohesion within President Rousseff&#8217;s<br \/>\ncabinet and contributes to our assessment of a weaker credit profile. Given<br \/>\nthe magnitude of the challenges on the political, economic, and fiscal fronts<br \/>\nfacing Brazil, we had assumed unwavering cabinet support in order to maximize<br \/>\nthe executive&#8217;s negotiating power with Congress.<\/p>\n<p>We now expect the general government deficit to rise to an average of 8% of<br \/>\nGDP in 2015 and 2016 before declining to 5.9% in 2017, versus 6.1% in 2014. We<br \/>\ndo not expect a primary fiscal surplus in 2015 or 2016. A high (and<br \/>\nslow-to-decline) interest burden (given higher interest rates and the impact<br \/>\nof the weaker Brazilian real on outstanding foreign exchange swaps)<br \/>\ncontributes to the large deficit. The slightly larger change in general<br \/>\ngovernment debt to GDP vis-\u00e0-vis the headline deficit incorporates some<br \/>\nfluctuations in central bank repo operations and an end to off-budget<br \/>\n(below-the-line) spending.<\/p>\n<p>We expect general government debt, net of liquid assets (not including<br \/>\ninternational reserves), to rise to 53% of GDP this year and to 59% next year<br \/>\nfrom 47% in 2014. We also expect interest to revenues to remain above 20% this<br \/>\nyear and next, from 15% last year, and to moderate slowly given the<br \/>\ndepreciation of the Brazilian real and higher interest rates. We assess<br \/>\ncontingent liabilities from the financial sector and all Brazilian NFPEs<br \/>\n(nonfinancial public enterprises, including Petrobras) as &#8220;limited,&#8221; as our<br \/>\ncriteria define the term.<\/p>\n<p>Our rating on Brazil reflects our view of its established political<br \/>\ninstitutions and broad commitment to policies that maintain economic<br \/>\nstability&#8211;albeit somewhat weaker than before. We find that the ongoing<br \/>\ninvestigations of corruption allegations against high-profile individuals and<br \/>\ncompanies&#8211;in both the private and public sectors and across political<br \/>\nparties&#8211;have led to increased near-term political uncertainty.<\/p>\n<p>These<br \/>\nindependent investigations and subsequent prosecutions of corrupt practices<br \/>\nare a testament to the institutional framework in Brazil, which contrasts with<br \/>\nthat of other emerging economies. At the same time, they have weakened<br \/>\nnear-term political cohesion and coalition dynamics. Stressed coalition<br \/>\ndynamics between the Workers&#8217; Party and the Brazilian Democratic Movement<br \/>\nParty augur poorly for approval of needed fiscal adjustment measures, even<br \/>\nwith a relaxed fiscal target, in our view. This is against a backdrop of low<br \/>\napproval ratings for President Rousseff and her government, which have<br \/>\ndeclined to less than 10%, and the possibility that the president may be<br \/>\nimpeached (although this outcome is not our base case).<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, we continue to believe that economic weakness exacerbates execution<br \/>\nrisk. We now expect the contraction in real GDP to be deeper and longer, with<br \/>\nanother revision to our growth outlook. Our projections estimate a contraction<br \/>\nof about 2.5% this year followed by another 0.5% contraction in 2016, before<br \/>\nreturning to modest growth in 2017.<\/p>\n<p>With per capita GDP of about US$8,900, Brazil&#8217;s growth prospects are, in our<br \/>\nopinion, below that of other countries at a similar stage of development.<br \/>\nNotwithstanding the more recent hesitation on the magnitude of the needed<br \/>\nfiscal adjustment, the government has adopted other policies to lay the<br \/>\nfoundation for growth over the medium term. The government is reducing<br \/>\noff-budget spending and removing various economic distortions, including<br \/>\nartificially suppressed administered prices. To contain inflation and<br \/>\ninflation expectations, the central bank embarked on another tightening cycle.<br \/>\nIt had also moderated intervention in the foreign exchange market (through<br \/>\nsome curtailment of the offer of U.S. dollars via its real-denominated foreign<br \/>\nexchange swap program), facilitating depreciation of the real, though it has<br \/>\nincreased intervention recently. The government has also placed renewed<br \/>\nemphasis on private-sector participation in infrastructure projects. We do not<br \/>\nsee, however, that these positive steps have turned around business sentiment.<br \/>\nIn our observations, policy decisions have damaged business sentiment in<br \/>\nrecent years, and the uncertainties and spillover effects associated with the<br \/>\ncorruption investigations continue to hold sentiment back. It now appears that<br \/>\nBrazil is further away from a shift to positive growth until some of the<br \/>\npolitical uncertainties settle.<\/p>\n<p>We expect Brazil&#8217;s external vulnerability will rise somewhat over the next<br \/>\nseveral years. We don&#8217;t expect foreign direct investment (FDI) to fully cover<br \/>\nBrazil&#8217;s current account deficit at about 4% of GDP in 2015-2017. We expect<br \/>\nnarrow net external debt to average of 36% of current account receipts from<br \/>\n2015-2017. Our estimates of external debt are calculated on a residency basis.<br \/>\nThey include nonresident holdings of locally issued real-denominated<br \/>\ngovernment debt estimated at about US$153 billion (55% of current account<br \/>\nreceipts) in 2014. These holdings have risen in reais terms so far this year<br \/>\n(though were down on a monthly basis in July); however, given currency<br \/>\ndepreciation, we expect them to be lower in 2015 and 2016 in U.S. dollar<br \/>\nterms. Our external debt data, however, do not include debt of approximately<br \/>\n30% of current account receipts raised offshore by Petrobras and transferred<br \/>\nin the form of FDI to the head office. That said, despite the wider current<br \/>\naccount deficit, Brazil has low external financing needs compared with its<br \/>\ncurrent account receipts and its high level of international reserves compared<br \/>\nwith some of its peers.<br \/>\nThe local currency rating on Brazil is higher than the foreign currency<br \/>\nrating, reflecting our view of the credibility of its monetary policy, its<br \/>\nfloating exchange-rate regime, and the depth of its capital markets. In<br \/>\naccordance with our criteria, we lowered the local currency rating two notches<br \/>\nto narrow the gap between the two ratings because of Brazil&#8217;s fiscal<br \/>\nperformance.<\/p>\n<p>Outlook<br \/>\nThe negative outlook reflects our view that there is a greater than one\u2013in\u2013three likelihood that we could lower our ratings on Brazil again. We anticiapte that within the next year a downgrade could stem in particular from a further deterioration of Brazil&#8217;s fiscal position, or from potential keypolicy reversals given the fluid political dynamics, including a further lack of cohesion within the cabinet. A downgrade could also result from greater<br \/>\neconomic turmoil than we currently expect either due to governability issues<br \/>\nor the weakened external environment.<\/p>\n<p>We could revise the outlook to stable if Brazil&#8217;s political uncertainties and<br \/>\nconditions for consistent policy execution were to improve across branches of<br \/>\ngovernment to staunch fiscal deterioration and stregthen GDP growth prospects.<br \/>\nWe expect that these improvements would support a quicker turnaround and could<br \/>\nhelp Brazil exit from the current recession, facilitating improved fiscal<br \/>\nperformance and providing more room to maneuver in the face of economic<br \/>\nshocks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>G1 O Brasil perdeu o grau de investimento na classifica\u00e7\u00e3o de cr\u00e9dito da Standard and Poor&#8217;s (S&amp;P), informou a ag\u00eancia de classifica\u00e7\u00e3o de risco nesta quarta-feira (09). A nota do pa\u00eds foi rebaixada de &#8220;BBB-&#8221; para &#8220;BB+&#8221;, com perspectiva negativa. O rebaixamento do rating do Brasil para a categoria &#8220;especulativa&#8221; acontece menos de 50 dias ap\u00f3s a ag\u00eancia ter mudado a perspectiva para negativa. \u00a0 S&amp;P REBAIXA BRASIL Pa\u00eds perde grau de investimento not\u00edcia do rebaixamento \u00edntegra do an\u00fancio da s&amp;p o que \u00e9 grau de investimento repercuss\u00e3o pol\u00edtica an\u00e1lise de tha\u00eds her\u00e9dia an\u00e1lise da austin rating Em seu comunicado,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68991","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-noticias"],"acf":[],"views":707,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68991","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68991"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68991\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":68992,"href":"https:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68991\/revisions\/68992"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68991"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.walcordeiro.com.br\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}